Unread post
by GuitarGuy305 » Sun Apr 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Well, unfortunately this does sound like a situation where you will need to track down the two amps you are comparing at a music store, and test both of them.
To elaborate further on my previous comments, I do think Marshalls are a better "all around" amp. Like I said, I had a Fender Ultimate Chorus, that sucked for metal, but was great for blues, or just a mild overdrive. On my friends Marshall yesterday, I have a ESP/LTD KH-602, which is built for metal and speed, and that's what I was playing. I was also playing my epi Les Paul through the amp. The crunch of the amp was unbelieveable, and I didn't even need to use any of my own stompboxes.
My friend, who owns the amp, has an American Strat, and he's into funk, blues, and jazzy stuff. He bought the amp, and he loves it. He is not a metalhead.
My comments last night were imcomplete, my main point is that I feel Marshall's are more all around amps, while Fender's can be limited as far as sound reproduction. That is, at least from my experience.
My brother in law also has a Marshall combo, which he loves. He plays a lot of metal, again, but he is also into SRV, and plays tons of SRV songs, which sound unbelievable through his Marshall.
I still suggest comparing the two amps for yourself if you can at a music store, that is the only way to really decide. We could all go back and forth saying "Marshalls are great for this reason" and "Fenders are great for this reason". Too many opinions from too many different people will just confuse you.