Dave Nominated for a Grammy

fatjack · Unread post by **fatjack** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:33 pm

crash_in_to_me wrote:befpre these croweded streets was nominated for a grammy i think

im pretty sure it wasn't considering it was flamed by almost every single critic

Appfro · Unread post by **Appfro** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:34 pm

just proves how stupid critics are

taylordb · Unread post by **taylordb** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:51 pm

I agree with you all...but I have to have a bit of pride in the Grammy's.

My oldest brother won a Grammy back in the 80's. He was the Curator of Jazz History for the Smithsonian Institute and part of his duties was that he helped produce all of the Smithsonian's musical box sets. He did a bunch, the history of jazz, the history of country music, etc. but the one that he won the Grammy for was the History of Popular Music (music of the 1940's).
The Grammy was for the Best Historical Album of 198?. He didn't think he stood a chance because they were up against an Elvis Presley historical set that was selling very well at the time.
I agree that the Grammy is more about popularity or ability to sell $$$ than true musical talent...but in his case I think he deserved it because...well....he's my brother

Coldchillin · Unread post by **Coldchillin** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:12 pm

taylordb wrote:I agree with you all...but I have to have a bit of pride in the Grammy's.

My oldest brother won a Grammy back in the 80's. He was the Curator of Jazz History for the Smithsonian Institute and part of his duties was that he helped produce all of the Smithsonian's musical box sets. He did a bunch, the history of jazz, the history of country music, etc. but the one that he won the Grammy for was the History of Popular Music (music of the 1940's).
The Grammy was for the Best Historical Album of 198?. He didn't think he stood a chance because they were up against an Elvis Presley historical set that was selling very well at the time.
I agree that the Grammy is more about popularity or ability to sell $$$ than true musical talent...but in his case I think he deserved it because...well....he's my brother

Is anyone here dave's brother??????? Couldn't be, so no luck there...

Appfro · Unread post by **Appfro** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:26 pm

taylordb wrote:I agree with you all...but I have to have a bit of pride in the Grammy's.

My oldest brother won a Grammy back in the 80's. He was the Curator of Jazz History for the Smithsonian Institute and part of his duties was that he helped produce all of the Smithsonian's musical box sets. He did a bunch, the history of jazz, the history of country music, etc. but the one that he won the Grammy for was the History of Popular Music (music of the 1940's).
The Grammy was for the Best Historical Album of 198?. He didn't think he stood a chance because they were up against an Elvis Presley historical set that was selling very well at the time.
I agree that the Grammy is more about popularity or ability to sell $$$ than true musical talent...but in his case I think he deserved it because...well....he's my brother

dude that's awesome that your brother won a grammy. that's gotta be one of the coolest things ive heard on here in a while. i don't care how political it is, id like a grammy if i worked hard on something

Coldchillin · Unread post by **Coldchillin** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:31 pm

Appsoldier wrote:
taylordb wrote:I agree with you all...but I have to have a bit of pride in the Grammy's.

My oldest brother won a Grammy back in the 80's. He was the Curator of Jazz History for the Smithsonian Institute and part of his duties was that he helped produce all of the Smithsonian's musical box sets. He did a bunch, the history of jazz, the history of country music, etc. but the one that he won the Grammy for was the History of Popular Music (music of the 1940's).
The Grammy was for the Best Historical Album of 198?. He didn't think he stood a chance because they were up against an Elvis Presley historical set that was selling very well at the time.
I agree that the Grammy is more about popularity or ability to sell $$$ than true musical talent...but in his case I think he deserved it because...well....he's my brother
dude that's awesome that your brother won a grammy. that's gotta be one of the coolest things ive heard on here in a while. i don't care how political it is, id like a grammy if i worked hard on something

I'd want something for workinghard...lol. Shit, I am lazy, so if I do work, I want recognition

Jay · Unread post by **Jay** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 5:36 pm

fatjack wrote:
crash_in_to_me wrote:befpre these croweded streets was nominated for a grammy i think
im pretty sure it wasn't considering it was flamed by almost every single critic

actually, BTCS was nominated for best rock album, and Crush was nominated for best pop performance.

zeppelin41 · Unread post by **zeppelin41** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 6:25 pm

in 2001 DMB got "Best Live Band" on the VH1 award show.. that was based on viewer votes

(I think that's the right year)

Coldchillin · Unread post by **Coldchillin** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:16 pm

zeppelin41 wrote:in 2001 DMB got "Best Live Band" on the VH1 award show.. that was based on viewer votes

(I think that's the right year)

They had better. They are the best live band. Period.

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:26 pm

I believe that these should be based on viewer votes. I mean, its the viewers that buy the stuff, and dont make any money (unless your one of THOSE people) off of it. We buy it just cause we love the music. Although, then it would be a popularity contest. I mean, SMTS, dont get me wrong. That song is pretty kickass but its the same two beats the entire song. I guess the only way to get a fair grammy is have you pass a test before you vote. Two Step should have won :roll:

fatjack · Unread post by **fatjack** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 1:42 pm

Beauford33 wrote:I believe that these should be based on viewer votes. I mean, its the viewers that buy the stuff, and dont make any money (unless your one of THOSE people) off of it. We buy it just cause we love the music. Although, then it would be a popularity contest. I mean, SMTS, dont get me wrong. That song is pretty kickass but its the same two beats the entire song. I guess the only way to get a fair grammy is have you pass a test before you vote. Two Step should have won

you are making an assumption that common people care about dmb as much as you do. most people are just casual listeners. i hate to say it, but the common person has awful taste in music...

Appfro · Unread post by **Appfro** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 3:15 pm

fatjack wrote:
Beauford33 wrote:I believe that these should be based on viewer votes. I mean, its the viewers that buy the stuff, and dont make any money (unless your one of THOSE people) off of it. We buy it just cause we love the music. Although, then it would be a popularity contest. I mean, SMTS, dont get me wrong. That song is pretty kickass but its the same two beats the entire song. I guess the only way to get a fair grammy is have you pass a test before you vote. Two Step should have won
you are making an assumption that common people care about dmb as much as you do. most people are just casual listeners. i hate to say it, but the common person has awful taste in music...

i man after my own heart. if the common man didn't have shitty taste in music, there would be no brittany spears or backstreet boys etc.

...or country music at all for that matter

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 4:33 pm

yeah, I guess what I did say was very not right. damn, I can never post a good post with out fucking it up

Coldchillin · Unread post by **Coldchillin** » Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:35 pm

Appsoldier wrote:
fatjack wrote:
Beauford33 wrote:I believe that these should be based on viewer votes. I mean, its the viewers that buy the stuff, and dont make any money (unless your one of THOSE people) off of it. We buy it just cause we love the music. Although, then it would be a popularity contest. I mean, SMTS, dont get me wrong. That song is pretty kickass but its the same two beats the entire song. I guess the only way to get a fair grammy is have you pass a test before you vote. Two Step should have won
you are making an assumption that common people care about dmb as much as you do. most people are just casual listeners. i hate to say it, but the common person has awful taste in music...
i man after my own heart. if the common man didn't have shitty taste in music, there would be no brittany spears or backstreet boys etc.

...or country music at all for that matter

I loathe country music. I hate hearing people say how bad DMB is and then pop on something that I can play from hearing it once. It's just that it makes me wonder. Different strokes for different folks, I suppose.

Davy28 · Unread post by **Davy28** » Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:56 pm

Good, I'm not the only one who loathes country music. Which grammy did SMTS win?

DMBTabs.com

Dave Nominated for a Grammy

Who is online