Gibson Les Paul

Cus D'Amato · Unread post by **Cus D'Amato** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:42 am

I am looking at getting an electric guitar now and I've had my eye on a Gibson Les Paul for a while now. I was wondering what exactly are the differences between the Supreme, Classic, Standard, and Studio? Any information on these guitars from somebody who doesn't work for Gibson would be really helpful. This is my first post by the way.

ForksonKnives · Unread post by **ForksonKnives** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:10 am

I have a standard and all I know is that it is heavy as shit and makes my left shoulder hurt.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:06 pm

they arent haevy... forky is a pansy girl

Appfro · Unread post by **Appfro** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:21 pm

they're heavy. it's one of the reasons i went for hollow body

bassman462 · Unread post by **bassman462** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:46 pm

they are heavy just gotta get use to them.

Kahn · Unread post by **Kahn** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:14 pm

Appfro wrote:they're heavy. it's one of the reasons i went for hollow body :)

hollow body guitars have the potential to be amazing, that is if you are willing to avoid the cheap-o ones.

Ranting Thespian · Unread post by **Ranting Thespian** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:20 pm

they are heavy because it's just solid wood with electronics.

Here's my thoughts on the different models:

Standard - the most well rounded Les Paul
Studio - just like the standard, just less frills on it. I have a studio and love it.
Classic - open pickups, and it's harsher and crunchier.
Surpreme - has a flamed maple top, and more little pretty things, nothing different in electronics

I would say get the studio, it's the best buy, and you don't lose any sound on it.

If you want a lighter Les Paul for less money, look at a Faded Les Paul. It's got a flat body, no arched top. They sound as great as the standard or the studio, just with no frills, and less wood.

GuitarGuy305 · Unread post by **GuitarGuy305** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 1:51 pm

I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:26 pm

GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.

theres no cure for pansiness! :lol:

Machtimus · Unread post by **Machtimus** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:42 pm

praisedave wrote:
GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.
theres no cure for pansiness!

you probably haven't played a les paul for more than 5 minutes...

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:52 pm

Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.
theres no cure for pansiness!
you probably haven't played a les paul for more than 5 minutes...

i have an lp youngun

Machtimus · Unread post by **Machtimus** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:01 pm

praisedave wrote:
Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.
theres no cure for pansiness!
you probably haven't played a les paul for more than 5 minutes...
i have an lp youngun

the juniors don't count

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:06 pm

Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.
theres no cure for pansiness!
you probably haven't played a les paul for more than 5 minutes...
i have an lp youngun
the juniors don't count

heh heh... no its standard size, but its a kit so the quality is average

Ranting Thespian · Unread post by **Ranting Thespian** » Sun May 01, 2005 12:19 am

praisedave wrote:
Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
Machtimus wrote:
praisedave wrote:
GuitarGuy305 wrote:I agree that Les Pauls are heavy guitars, but a lot of electrics are. My KH-602 is a tank, and pretty heavy. You more or less just condition yourself to the guitar and get used to it after a while.

If your back seriously hurts because of a guitar, I'd see a doctor.
theres no cure for pansiness!
you probably haven't played a les paul for more than 5 minutes...
i have an lp youngun
the juniors don't count
heh heh... no its standard size, but its a kit so the quality is average

The Juniors weigh just as much as a Faded, and has the exact same body and cuts and everything a faded has, except it's one pickup on them, single coiled. They aren't bad guitars at all, they are about 600-700. Artists like Green Day use them.

I also never stand with my les paul, unless I have to. I normaly sit.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Sun May 01, 2005 8:57 am

mah bad, thought he was talkin about this

DMBTabs.com

Gibson Les Paul

Gibson Les Paul

Who is online