Nutshell - Alice in Chains cover

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:14 am

I re-recorded the lead fills...
http://s21.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0TET ... 3YAUHB2HL3

Matty Boom · Unread post by **Matty Boom** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:56 am

nice work speen, nice work, i enjoyed it

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:22 pm

well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:31 pm

praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho

Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:37 pm

BigSpeen3436 wrote:
praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho
Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.

in the begginning its perfect, and it is for a large part of it, but at 46 seconds it tops out and gets volume drive on it. and at a few more places in it. this prolly bothers me more than anyone else, i dunno why its just always annoyed me. plus you could've maybe turned the progression a little bit. you just play it like a robot. throw in some mutes and some dynamic changes. but hey, thats just nitpicky its a great cover.

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:39 pm

Alright I see what you mean. I dunno why I sped it up right there. As for the mutes/changes/etc. I guess we were just trying to sound more like the original.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:43 pm

i gotcha, but some change is a good thing, it can make the song more yours

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:17 pm

Oh yeah, I tried emphasizing the bass notes as opposed to the bottom two strings.

MWR · Unread post by **MWR** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:20 pm

praisedave wrote:
BigSpeen3436 wrote:
praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho
Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.
in the begginning its perfect, and it is for a large part of it, but at 46 seconds it tops out and gets volume drive on it. and at a few more places in it. this prolly bothers me more than anyone else, i dunno why its just always annoyed me. plus you could've maybe turned the progression a little bit. you just play it like a robot. throw in some mutes and some dynamic changes. but hey, thats just nitpicky its a great cover.

I'm not sure where Praise is getting his lingo from but there is a hefty amount of clipping a.k.a. volume drive going on. Ohterwise it was a nice little jam. Great song choice too.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:12 pm

MWR wrote:
praisedave wrote:
BigSpeen3436 wrote:
praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho
Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.
in the begginning its perfect, and it is for a large part of it, but at 46 seconds it tops out and gets volume drive on it. and at a few more places in it. this prolly bothers me more than anyone else, i dunno why its just always annoyed me. plus you could've maybe turned the progression a little bit. you just play it like a robot. throw in some mutes and some dynamic changes. but hey, thats just nitpicky its a great cover.
I'm not sure where Praise is getting his lingo from but there is a hefty amount of clipping a.k.a. volume drive going on. Ohterwise it was a nice little jam. Great song choice too.

i get my vocabulary from my head. clipping is overdrive when the volume of the guitar is higher than the volume of the mic on the cpu. hence VOLUME DRIVE!!! i didnt know clipping was the term, thanks mike

MWR · Unread post by **MWR** » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:16 pm

praisedave wrote:
MWR wrote:
praisedave wrote:
BigSpeen3436 wrote:
praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho
Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.
in the begginning its perfect, and it is for a large part of it, but at 46 seconds it tops out and gets volume drive on it. and at a few more places in it. this prolly bothers me more than anyone else, i dunno why its just always annoyed me. plus you could've maybe turned the progression a little bit. you just play it like a robot. throw in some mutes and some dynamic changes. but hey, thats just nitpicky its a great cover.
I'm not sure where Praise is getting his lingo from but there is a hefty amount of clipping a.k.a. volume drive going on. Ohterwise it was a nice little jam. Great song choice too.
i get my vocabulary from my head. clipping is overdrive when the volume of the guitar is higher than the volume of the mic on the cpu. hence VOLUME DRIVE!!! i didnt know clipping was the term, thanks mike

You're a funny little man. :wink:

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:13 pm

MWR wrote:
praisedave wrote:
MWR wrote:
praisedave wrote:
BigSpeen3436 wrote:
praisedave wrote:well done, this ones better, although i still think that the rythm is a bigger problem then the fills were. The fills were better on this one tho
Then you are hearing something I'm not, or you have yet to realize we recorded directly to my friends soundcard. I'm not trying to sound like an ass, but with the setup we have the rhythm can't get a lot cleaner.
in the begginning its perfect, and it is for a large part of it, but at 46 seconds it tops out and gets volume drive on it. and at a few more places in it. this prolly bothers me more than anyone else, i dunno why its just always annoyed me. plus you could've maybe turned the progression a little bit. you just play it like a robot. throw in some mutes and some dynamic changes. but hey, thats just nitpicky its a great cover.
I'm not sure where Praise is getting his lingo from but there is a hefty amount of clipping a.k.a. volume drive going on. Ohterwise it was a nice little jam. Great song choice too.
i get my vocabulary from my head. clipping is overdrive when the volume of the guitar is higher than the volume of the mic on the cpu. hence VOLUME DRIVE!!! i didnt know clipping was the term, thanks mike
You're a funny little man.

Yeah I guess that will happen when plugging directly into a sound card. I'm probably getting one of those M-Audio MobilePre USB's sometime soon so hopefully that will help.

Ryeguy · Unread post by **Ryeguy** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:37 pm

praisedave wrote:i gotcha, but some change is a good thing, it can make the song more yours

but its a cover man.. :roll:

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:32 pm

Ryeguy wrote:
praisedave wrote:i gotcha, but some change is a good thing, it can make the song more yours
but its a cover man..

so you should play covers EXACTLY like the band thatwrote them? that would be boring... :roll:

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:36 pm

praisedave wrote:
Ryeguy wrote:
praisedave wrote:i gotcha, but some change is a good thing, it can make the song more yours
but its a cover man..
so you should play covers EXACTLY like the band thatwrote them? that would be boring...

I dunno I thought it was good for a bunch of bums like ourselves. This is the first time we have ever recorded anything together and I thought it went pretty well.

DMBTabs.com

Nutshell - Alice in Chains cover

Who is online