Old dave or new?

mbgreen · Unread post by **mbgreen** » Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:20 pm

Coldchillin23222 wrote:It's amazing how he keeps writing such amazing stuff

I think its amazing people think the new stuff is amazing. Its not terrible or anything, but its definitely not great. Its DEF not great if you compare it to past albums.

Dave in 96 or 97. Those were his prime years. His voice had developed enough so it wasnt just a warble like it was in the early early days, but it hadnt been scratched dry like it is now. Musically, the band had been playing together for half a decade or so...long enough to be tight with eachother, without being so polished its stale. The new stuff is just bleh. Its not bad, its not good. It just "is."

thejoe · Unread post by **thejoe** » Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:50 pm

mbgreen wrote:
Coldchillin23222 wrote:It's amazing how he keeps writing such amazing stuff
I think its amazing people think the new stuff is amazing. Its not terrible or anything, but its definitely not great. Its DEF not great if you compare it to past albums.

Dave in 96 or 97. Those were his prime years. His voice had developed enough so it wasnt just a warble like it was in the early early days, but it hadnt been scratched dry like it is now. Musically, the band had been playing together for half a decade or so...long enough to be tight with eachother, without being so polished its stale. The new stuff is just bleh. Its not bad, its not good. It just "is."

well said

i seriously think that people like the new albums just because theyre dmb

stevemcsandwhich · Unread post by **stevemcsandwhich** » Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:39 pm

i'd agree with that sorta on alblums like Everyday but Some Devil is a lot better then people give credit

DT · Unread post by DT » Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:07 pm

BTCS is definitely peak DMB

i love acronymns

Jonny123 · Unread post by **Jonny123** » Wed Jan 14, 2004 9:53 pm

mbgreen wrote:
Coldchillin23222 wrote:It's amazing how he keeps writing such amazing stuff
I think its amazing people think the new stuff is amazing. Its not terrible or anything, but its definitely not great. Its DEF not great if you compare it to past albums.

Dave in 96 or 97. Those were his prime years. His voice had developed enough so it wasnt just a warble like it was in the early early days, but it hadnt been scratched dry like it is now. Musically, the band had been playing together for half a decade or so...long enough to be tight with eachother, without being so polished its stale. The new stuff is just bleh. Its not bad, its not good. It just "is."

Wow...my hero. Very well stated, and i believe 100% with everything in you wrote. :applause:

JustAnotherAnt · Unread post by **JustAnotherAnt** » Thu Jan 15, 2004 12:18 am

Old dave is the best but new dave is not far from it. Now Some Devil wasn't as great as I expected and either was busted stuff but I can still put on the CD's and listen to it all the way through and be damn happy.

DMBTabs.com

Old dave or new?

Who is online