Listener Supported or Central Park?

jellyfish · Unread post by **jellyfish** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:54 pm

Central Park Setlist sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very Generic.

i am sam2 · Unread post by **i am sam2** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:05 pm

jellyfish wrote:Central Park Setlist sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very Generic.

it may be generic, but its good. and not to mention the actual performance of the songs is undoubtedly the best of any live release. so much energy. the jimi thing jam is absolutely kickass and sweet and warren hayes is godlike on it. ddtw is the best version, as is smts-astb, granny is the best version, crush is kickass, nancies is kickass, warehouse is probably the best, two step is the best of the recent ones (the darker jam, not the happy rr version), ants is the best you can get without the funk intro, help myself is sweet, wwys is flawless, wayg wasnt over played then and was alright, watchtower was godlike and energized, grey street was perfect, wya was energetic and ridiculously good, and stay just owned (the beginning and when he starts scream scatting....gives me chills)

Nitro1515 · Unread post by **Nitro1515** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:17 pm

This isn't even close, Listener Supported is a million times better.

i am sam2 · Unread post by **i am sam2** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:38 pm

Nitro1515 wrote:This isn't even close, Listener Supported is a million times better.

surely you jest

Speenis · Unread post by **Speenis** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:16 pm

The setlist to LS is much much better IMO, but the warehouse and nancies on CP make it worth getting, plus the camera work is 10x better IMO.

Davy28 · Unread post by **Davy28** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:20 pm

i am sam2 wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:This isn't even close, Listener Supported is a million times better.
surely you jest

LS is more the chill, lets hit up some chronic and sashay around the room concert.

CP is more like, lets take some speed and dance around the room till we pass out.

gravesRR7 · Unread post by **gravesRR7** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:47 pm

Davy28 wrote:
i am sam2 wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:.
surely you jest
LS is more the chill, lets hit up some chronic and sashay around the room concert.

CP is more like, lets take some speed and dance around the room till we pass out.

paulaitchison · Unread post by **paulaitchison** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:57 pm

list supported is truly special, only dmb could have played a concert so flawlesly, on the other hard cp rocks harder.
if you want a rock dvd then c.p. .
if you want a jazzy, more relaxed dvd.... list supported.
i recon list supported for audio, cp for visual energy...cut way better
then again .........who yould you rather see guest..
warren haynes or the lovley(ish) ladies

Mikey · Unread post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm

i am sam2 wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:This isn't even close, Listener Supported is a million times better.
surely you jest

i'm not jesting, and dont call me sherly

i am sam2 · Unread post by **i am sam2** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:04 pm

DMBassist52 wrote:
i am sam2 wrote:
Nitro1515 wrote:This isn't even close, Listener Supported is a million times better.
surely you jest
i'm not jesting, and dont call me sherly

nice

charliemike · Unread post by **charliemike** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:15 pm

I have both. Central Park by a long shot.

Though I love the Rapunzel on LS, the rest of the show isn't nearly as energetic as CP.

Nitro1515 · Unread post by **Nitro1515** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:26 pm

Why does everyone get so excited about the enerygy of a show? If the setlist sucks then the show sucks I don't care what kind of energy the have. CP is a mediocre setlist with a lot of energy. LS is an excellent setlist with a decent amount of energy, therefore in my book LS is better than CP. And besides any show that contains Where Are You Going and When The World Ends immediately gets taken down a few notches.

i am sam2 · Unread post by **i am sam2** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:34 pm

Nitro1515 wrote:Why does everyone get so excited about the enerygy of a show? If the setlist sucks then the show sucks I don't care what kind of energy the have. CP is a mediocre setlist with a lot of energy. LS is an excellent setlist with a decent amount of energy, therefore in my book LS is better than CP. And besides any show that contains Where Are You Going and When The World Ends immediately gets taken down a few notches.

so youd rather see DMB half-ass a good setlist than play a mediocre one to their fullest?

and warren haynes is better than the lovely ladies. anything with them sucks. so many of the songs in LS are just half-assed energy wise and not played how they should be. ddtw? weak. stay? weak. watchtower? weak. jimi thing? weak. too much? weak.

i like tictacs · Unread post by **i like tictacs** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:44 pm

Nitro1515 wrote:Why does everyone get so excited about the enerygy of a show? If the setlist sucks then the show sucks I don't care what kind of energy the have. CP is a mediocre setlist with a lot of energy. LS is an excellent setlist with a decent amount of energy, therefore in my book LS is better than CP. And besides any show that contains Where Are You Going and When The World Ends immediately gets taken down a few notches.

LS has the lovely ladies.(game) and other than rapunzel and the stone, meh.

game set match.

i-am-me · Unread post by **i-am-me** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:51 pm

yeah...lovely ladies can suck it. and i can honestly say that i have not seen central park all the way through.

(i decided to buy listener supported) haha. this was a long time ago.

DMBTabs.com

Listener Supported or Central Park?

Who is online