Rolling Stone top 100 Guitarists

filmdude100cms · Unread post by **filmdude100cms** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 3:46 pm

thats bull...

how does cobain get 12, when trey anastasio, and van halen get in the 70's and angus young barley makes it.

Ryeguy · Unread post by **Ryeguy** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 3:59 pm

yeah.. i don't think it measured the 'skill' or technique of the guitar player had.. maybe it was just a popularity contest in the long run. Most people don't even know who Tim Reynolds even is.. I think that 100 top guitars players just appeals to the majority of the public...

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:00 pm

Joan Jett is on there

Rweden36 · Unread post by **Rweden36** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:07 pm

I think they got the top five right, Jimi, Duane, B.B, and Clapton are the best, but the rest of the list is bull.

Pacs · Unread post by **Pacs** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:41 pm

Warren Haynes made the list... yay at least for that... he got a good spot too, #23!

onid41 · Unread post by **onid41** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:17 pm

pheobe from friends shoulda made it

fatjack · Unread post by **fatjack** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:41 pm

GrateDMB21 wrote:I can understand why Dave is not in the list. But no Tim Reynolds thats insane. Also what about artists like Ben Harper or Leo Kottke. They created two very unique styles. Ben on lapsteel and well Kottke, who is just unbelievable on 12-string. Anyone else think any other guitarists that shafted from this list?

since when did ben harper revolutionize lap steel??

first of all, the list is not BEST gutiarists of all time, its most INFLUENTIAL. its a rather minute detail, and still makes the list a complete load of crap, especially considering Django Reinhardt (who was one of the first to play the instrument as a melodic device rather than just rhythm) wasn't even on there.

and i dont care who you are, no one thinks that joan jett was good OR influential...

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:58 pm

fatjack wrote:
GrateDMB21 wrote:I can understand why Dave is not in the list. But no Tim Reynolds thats insane. Also what about artists like Ben Harper or Leo Kottke. They created two very unique styles. Ben on lapsteel and well Kottke, who is just unbelievable on 12-string. Anyone else think any other guitarists that shafted from this list?
since when did ben harper revolutionize lap steel??

first of all, the list is not BEST gutiarists of all time, its most INFLUENTIAL. its a rather minute detail, and still makes the list a complete load of crap, especially considering Django Reinhardt (who was one of the first to play the instrument as a melodic device rather than just rhythm) wasn't even on there.

and i dont care who you are, no one thinks that joan jett was good OR influential...

Ummm...even Dave is better then Joan Jett.

But even that fact that it is popularity contest makes it flawed. IMO, Mayer should be on there (Last 10 for sure, but still be on there. my favorite soloist right now)

Kukini · Unread post by **Kukini** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:25 pm

onid41 wrote:pheobe from friends shoulda made it

My thoughts exactly!

ledzepp4l · Unread post by **ledzepp4l** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:50 pm

Whenever Rollingstone does little polls like that I lose respect for them. I guess they mean well, but they are never anywhere close to correct. It seems too main stream, like putting Jack White on the fucking list. I mean damn, do some research.

charliemike · Unread post by **charliemike** » Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:10 am

Let me put it this way ... If a guitarist requires the band name to associate him then how is he a "great guitarist"?

Clapton below Duane Allman? WTF?

That list was complete bolloxed up from the get go.

My top five:

1. Clapton
2. Hendrix
3. Page
4. Knopfler
5. Robert Johnson

And there are literally dozens of guys that should be on there that aren't ... like literally any guitarist from the Gipsy Kings for example.

BTW, with all due respect, I think Syd Barrett was the creative force behind Pink Floyd. When they ran out of ways to express their sadness about his descent into schizophrenia, the band foundered and Waters left.

But in terms of the band's dynamics, I think Waters was as influential (if not more so) as Glimour, whom I really like.

ledzepp4l · Unread post by **ledzepp4l** » Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:16 am

there is no way clapton is better than hendrix. when hendrix came on the scene clapton crapped his pants when he saw what jimmy was doing with the guitar.

subotai · Unread post by **subotai** » Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:48 am

Beauford33 wrote: But even that fact that it is popularity contest makes it flawed. IMO, Mayer should be on there (Last 10 for sure, but still be on there. my favorite soloist right now)

Do you think Mayer should be higher up on the list than Dave or Tim?

lyrics101 · Unread post by **lyrics101** » Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:27 pm

Mayer should be higher than Dave, no question, but not Tim.

In any case, it is the top 100 in American culture, and a lot of the consideration has to do with songwriting ability, not just speed or knowledge of the guitar.

Not that that justifies a lot of the list, but that's the way you have to look at it. Not to mention it IS Rolling Stone, so you can't expect them to know much about guitarists.

i like tictacs · Unread post by **i like tictacs** » Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:29 pm

I'd love to see a best bassist article

they'd probably put mark hoppus on top or something

terrible

DMBTabs.com

Rolling Stone top 100 Guitarists

Who is online