Stand Up - the next Everyday?

Talk anything and everything DMB here.

Moderators: onid41, jkanter

User avatar
Buck23
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Arlington, VA

Unread post by Buck23 » Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:31 am

thank you for all the helpful responses.

to the rest of you, go get laid or something. you guys suck.
Fear my recording setup:
Martin DX1
mtstudio
Computer Mic

"Ah, music - the joy the mind derives from counting without being aware that it is counting" - Leibniz

"Celebrate we will, for life is short but sweet for certain" - Dave

User avatar
Kahn
Has AIDS
Posts: 26188
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:30 pm
Random movie quote to make you seem hip and "with it": Can you put a lid on the squid?
Location: Poop

Re: Stand Up - the next Everyday?

Unread post by Kahn » Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:52 pm

mlb1399 wrote:
Buck23 wrote:American Baby sounded very produced and artificial (not much of Dave's acoustic featured). Sugar Will is an awesome song, but it has more of an everyday-album kind of flavor to it. Joy ride is awesome, Hello again is not.

don't get me wrong, I like everyday. but, it was kind of a different direction for the band, even compared to busted stuff. think we'll see more busted stuff style, or more everyday-ness on this new album?
I disagree with Hello Again. That was by far my favorite new song from last summer. It had that old DMB sound to it, full of energy, a blue grass/twangy sound, and familiar Dave type rhythms.

As far as the album goes, It's tough to say. At first I and everybody hated everyday. But a lot of songs have grown on me such as:what you are, So Right, Fool to Think, When the world ends, everyday. I think given time, it will probably grow on me.

As a creative and artistic band, I expect them to try different things and to grow. Doing the same thing over and over again gets boring. It's a lot easier to the same old routine thing over and over again then it is to try something new and change. As DMB fans, I expect a lot of us to be more open minded than other bands fans. After all, we appreciate creative jams and different interpretations of familar songs to show their creativity.

So much pop music is comprised of repetitive stuff that I don' understand how their fans don't get bored. Bands like Nickelback, Creed which any song you play virtually sounds the same. Then you look at some of the cheesy bands of the 80's that stuck with boring power chords or I-IV-V-I chord progressions.

I think of bands like Led Zeppelin, that tried and experimented with all sorts of different sounds and rhythyms(blue grass, hard rock, middle eastern, rhythm & blues, etc.) I am sure a lot of their fans maybe didn't like some of their tunes right away. I think the fact that they tried new things and made them work is one of the reasons why they are the greatest band ever, IMO.
good point, but I think of the Beatles. I mean, look how much they evolved over the years, from the poppy, "hold your hand" to the later stuff. Especially Sgt, Peppers where they did lots of experimentation.

User avatar
mlb1399
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2559
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Des Moines, IA

Unread post by mlb1399 » Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:35 pm

Kahn, you know who is responsible for that change, right???

Image

User avatar
a1075dd63aa12
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 16974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 6:25 pm
Location: Beelzebub

Unread post by a1075dd63aa12 » Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:20 pm

Buck23 wrote:thank you for all the helpful responses.

to the rest of you, go get laid or something. you guys suck.
sorry buck

ericwormann
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 45471
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 1:15 pm

Unread post by ericwormann » Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:54 pm

To me, the problem with this album is Carter's drumming. Everything else would be fine if his drumming wasn't so boring. Straight beats work with a lot of bands, this one just isn't one of them. His drumming has been the backbone of every album so far. When they play live, I think these songs will be great, but as far as this album goes, I think it's gonna be terrible.

bassman462
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 12063
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Unread post by bassman462 » Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:56 pm

serialwired wrote:I have not listened to any of the new tracks from "Stand Up" other than American Baby, I'd much rather be suprised when I buy it. But personally, I don't think the band will ever sink to the "Everday" level again. I think that album was totally a fluke. The one that slipped by. Plus, Glen Ballard had more of a hand in writing tunes for "Everyday" than the new producer had for "Stand Up". So hopefully, what we'll be hearing in the new album is Dave, and not Marc Broussard (sp?). But I'm keeping my fingers-crossed. I've heard only good things thus far.
what do you mean sink, i personally like everyday it might not of been as good as some others but still its dave matthews band and there freaking awsome and all there cd's are. there stuff on everyday is good and alot of songs on there they still play live. if you really dont like it that much then just go and listen to the old songs, adn everytime your at a concert when one of thoughs "suken" songs comes on put on earplugs if they bother you that much.
M

User avatar
jellyfish
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 11921
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:13 am

Unread post by jellyfish » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:03 pm

There's a new album coming out? Geez, I better get on track here with this DMB stuff. I didn't even know there was an Everyday album. :oops:

User avatar
Brock
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 47687
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 8:05 pm
Political views: Pragmatic civil libertarian with a tendency toward communal solutions to communal problems
Random movie quote to make you seem hip and "with it": Narcoleptic club owner Snoozin' Lucci
Location: Austin

Unread post by Brock » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:05 pm

bassman462 wrote:
serialwired wrote:I have not listened to any of the new tracks from "Stand Up" other than American Baby, I'd much rather be suprised when I buy it. But personally, I don't think the band will ever sink to the "Everday" level again. I think that album was totally a fluke. The one that slipped by. Plus, Glen Ballard had more of a hand in writing tunes for "Everyday" than the new producer had for "Stand Up". So hopefully, what we'll be hearing in the new album is Dave, and not Marc Broussard (sp?). But I'm keeping my fingers-crossed. I've heard only good things thus far.
what do you mean sink, i personally like everyday it might not of been as good as some others but still its dave matthews band
No, it's the Dave Matthews and Glen Ballard Band with studio backup.
business
blog

User avatar
Ranting Thespian
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 3163
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 3:34 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Unread post by Ranting Thespian » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:31 pm

mlb1399 wrote:Kahn, you know who is responsible for that change, right???

Image
if you really were a beatles fan and had the info, that has nothing to do with Sgt Peppers. John never wrote a song about drugs until Cold Turkey, his first solo single about him and yoko quitting heroin.

Actualy, the main influence on the album was . . . the beach boys. Yep, their Pet Sounds album inspired John and Paul very much. Also, the beatles never wrote songs while on heavy drugs, or while they were recording (they only did a little weed and such, that's it). The few times they tried it, they just made crap. Also just so this doesn't get brought up, I'll answer it right now. Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds is about a picture young Julian Lennon drew. John loved the drawing, and wrote the song about it. Again, the beatles did not write drug songs.
Yes, I am in a box
Image

-Ranting Thespian

User avatar
Ranting Thespian
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 3163
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 3:34 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Unread post by Ranting Thespian » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:33 pm

bbatsell wrote:No, it's the Dave Matthews and Glen Ballard Band with studio backup.
Yep. Carter said it wasn't a dmb album, it was a Dave and Glen album, but they made a great album.
Yes, I am in a box
Image

-Ranting Thespian

User avatar
Kahn
Has AIDS
Posts: 26188
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:30 pm
Random movie quote to make you seem hip and "with it": Can you put a lid on the squid?
Location: Poop

Unread post by Kahn » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:48 pm

am I the only one who thinks this album will knock my socks off?

User avatar
mattinbeloit
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:58 am

Unread post by mattinbeloit » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:54 pm

KahnTheRevelator wrote:am I the only one who thinks this album will knock my socks off?
no you're not, I'm going to start a thread about Stand Up not sucking, come post...

User avatar
everydayDMBfan_18
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 3942
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 6:14 pm
Location: Bellmawr, NJ
Contact:

Unread post by everydayDMBfan_18 » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:05 pm

Ranting Thespian wrote:
mlb1399 wrote:Kahn, you know who is responsible for that change, right???

Image
if you really were a beatles fan and had the info, that has nothing to do with Sgt Peppers. John never wrote a song about drugs until Cold Turkey, his first solo single about him and yoko quitting heroin.

Actualy, the main influence on the album was . . . the beach boys. Yep, their Pet Sounds album inspired John and Paul very much. Also, the beatles never wrote songs while on heavy drugs, or while they were recording (they only did a little weed and such, that's it). The few times they tried it, they just made crap. Also just so this doesn't get brought up, I'll answer it right now. Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds is about a picture young Julian Lennon drew. John loved the drawing, and wrote the song about it. Again, the beatles did not write drug songs.

I'd enjoy hearing what I Am the Walrus was about then :D
Ryan
8)

User avatar
jsgksu
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 43454
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:18 am
Random movie quote to make you seem hip and "with it": The food court is downstairs. The cookie stand is upstairs. It's not like we're talking quantum physics here.
Location: South Side Pittsburgh
Contact:

Unread post by jsgksu » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:06 pm

Ranting Thespian wrote:
mlb1399 wrote:Kahn, you know who is responsible for that change, right???

Image
if you really were a beatles fan and had the info, that has nothing to do with Sgt Peppers. John never wrote a song about drugs until Cold Turkey, his first solo single about him and yoko quitting heroin.

Actualy, the main influence on the album was . . . the beach boys. Yep, their Pet Sounds album inspired John and Paul very much. Also, the beatles never wrote songs while on heavy drugs, or while they were recording (they only did a little weed and such, that's it). The few times they tried it, they just made crap. Also just so this doesn't get brought up, I'll answer it right now. Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds is about a picture young Julian Lennon drew. John loved the drawing, and wrote the song about it. Again, the beatles did not write drug songs.
You tell you stories as if you were there with all these artists when these things happened. I swear I saw an interview with McCartney where he said they were all high out of their minds when they wrote/recorded at least one album.
-Jayme

User avatar
littlefriend
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 21186
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 10:55 pm
Political views: Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.54
Random movie quote to make you seem hip and "with it": Hamburgers! The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast.
Location: Kenosha, WI

Unread post by littlefriend » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:11 pm

Ranting Thespian wrote:if you really were a beatles fan and had the info, that has nothing to do with Sgt Peppers. John never wrote a song about drugs until Cold Turkey, his first solo single about him and yoko quitting heroin.

Actualy, the main influence on the album was . . . the beach boys. Yep, their Pet Sounds album inspired John and Paul very much. Also, the beatles never wrote songs while on heavy drugs, or while they were recording (they only did a little weed and such, that's it). The few times they tried it, they just made crap. Also just so this doesn't get brought up, I'll answer it right now. Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds is about a picture young Julian Lennon drew. John loved the drawing, and wrote the song about it. Again, the beatles did not write drug songs.
Riiiight. Sure, the Beatles never wrote any music while they were on drugs. If you believe that than you are quite naive. Quite. I'll give you that they may not have while recording or performing. But writing songs?

RRRRRRRRRRRRRReeeealll fuckin' high on drugs.

Just because they didn't write songs about drugs doesn't mean they weren't on drugs. "We all live in a yellow submarine?" Yeah. No drugs there. :roll:
-Ryan
CoSta wrote:HAIL SPEEN THE MASTER OF PUSSY EATING THE MEDICAL INSURANCE

Post Reply

Return to “General DMB Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 192 guests