Need help deciding...

Coldchillin · Unread post by **Coldchillin** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:55 pm

Get a 2003/4 614ce

thejoe · Unread post by **thejoe** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:04 am

i disagree, i think martins sound better in pretty much every situation

dave's taylor sounds like ass on the gorge.. the martin sounds perfect on listener supported

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am

praisedave wrote:
Beauford33 wrote:
praisedave wrote:martin personally, but its all opinion

(I would get a larrivee before either of those tho, i whore for them so much around here they should give me free instruments)
Except once they hear you play, they would realize that you are just giving them a bad name.
now now, i have proven myself to be one of the better instrumentalists on this board.

how?

MahlerGrooves · Unread post by **MahlerGrooves** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:45 am

I would really go with the Taylor, but that's probably just because I have one of those and not a Martin.

Basically, either one is an AMAZING, top quality, well built, well respected and beautiful sounding instrument. Discount the electronics, because you can drop a fishman into the Martin really easily (But the ES on the Taylor is fantastic and better, imo, than most other pickups I have heard).

Play them both, and pick which you like. I think the fact that this board of discerning ears and tastes seems to be split evenly between the two goes to show that you really cannot go wrong with either guitar.

Good luck!

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:53 am

Yes, it really comes down to what you like when you play them. Not what we tell you.

ForksonKnives · Unread post by **ForksonKnives** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:27 am

Yeah I just wanted some advantages/disadvantages or maybe some horror stories cause I got a Takamine EG523SC and it was the worst decision ever. It looks beautiful but it sounds like ass when its played cause the action is too low and it buzzes everywhere. I tried to have it adjusted but the guy says its not worth it cause the truss rod is complete shit. Anyways the input is really helpful. Thanks!

ForksonKnives · Unread post by **ForksonKnives** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:30 am

Coldchillin23222 wrote:Get a 2003/4 614ce

Why go with the Maple over the Rosewood? Oh and what the crap why is the 614 more expensive than the 714?

MahlerGrooves · Unread post by **MahlerGrooves** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:34 am

The maple will be a slightly brighter sound than the rosewood. The rosewood will be a bit more bassy, but, once again, it is all preference.

My 410-LTD is Imbuia wood which is an African hardwood similar to rosewood, and I love it. My friend had a few 6's that I played as well, but I just like that little bit of added boom that comes with the wood.

I once heard from a guy that a guitar sounds its worst the day you buy it. It will just mature and open up after that, and the sound will always - at least with the two you are choosing from - continue to get better.

Best of luck, and post some pics when you decide.

EDIT: I read on a different site that Imbuia is a Brazillian wood, and not African.

mangold · Unread post by **mangold** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:13 pm

MahlerGrooves wrote:The maple will be a slightly brighter sound than the rosewood. The rosewood will be a bit more bassy, but, once again, it is all preference.

My 410-LTD is Imbuia wood which is an African hardwood similar to rosewood, and I love it. My friend had a few 6's that I played as well, but I just like that little bit of added boom that comes with the wood.

I once heard from a guy that a guitar sounds its worst the day you buy it. It will just mature and open up after that, and the sound will always - at least with the two you are choosing from - continue to get better.

Best of luck, and post some pics when you decide.

just remember sound only improves if its REAL wood.

filmdude100cms · Unread post by **filmdude100cms** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:46 pm

martin

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:50 pm

btw, I was looking at them in my room....I think the HD is prettier, if that means anything.

ForksonKnives · Unread post by **ForksonKnives** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:53 pm

Did anyone answer my question about why the 614 is more expensive than the 714?

ForksonKnives · Unread post by **ForksonKnives** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:53 pm

Beauford33 wrote:btw, I was looking at them in my room....I think the HD is prettier, if that means anything.

Sounds like quite the room.

Beauford33 · Unread post by **Beauford33** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:55 pm

ForksonKnives wrote:
Beauford33 wrote:btw, I was looking at them in my room....I think the HD is prettier, if that means anything.
Sounds like quite the room.

there are a few more gems in there, but my room kinda sucks as a whole.

Kahn · Unread post by **Kahn** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:35 pm

The dreadnought is great for recording, but i personally don't like to use mine when playing live with the band because of comfort. That's why I like the 714ce. It depends on how often you perform live, or if you record more often. Personally I would go for a Larrivee OMV-10 (I think it is). Rosewood back and sides with a sitka spruce top and inlay that makes you cum your pants. I think the B Band A6 blows the pants of Fishman and ES as far as electronics. And if I'm not mistaken, it's cheaper than both these guitars. Don't limit yourself to Martin and Taylor because famous people play them. Shop around, play as many guitars as you can, and don't spend 3000+ dollars on a guitar because of a brand label on the headstock.

DMBTabs.com

Need help deciding...

Who is online