can someone explain modes to me?

This is the place to talk about guitar playing not done by Dave! Topics about techniques, styles, theory, and other guitarists go here.

Moderators: onid41, jkanter

gumbomadness
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:29 pm
Location: South Florida
Contact:

Unread post by gumbomadness » Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:10 am

fatjack wrote:
gumbomadness wrote:you woudnt say C phrygian, you would say Ab major..

i think. fatjack help.

Ya, you dont name song keys by the mode, you name them ofcourse by there major, minor, harmonic minor, relative minor, or melodic minor name.
unless you go into crazy-ass ethnic scales like Hindistani and stuff.
NO, its just major or minor. harmonic and melodic minor are scale FORMS, and relative minor is a term used for relating key signatures
thank you fat jack. so i learned..

you call it by ONLY its major or minor, and if its a particular mode close to the <inset reason> you would just call it by <inser> because you treat all the accidentals as accidentals within ... the name..

oh forget, it but i get it. thanks
" I give up on this six string shit. "
-DM

User avatar
fatjack
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 10165
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:09 am
Location: U of A
Contact:

Unread post by fatjack » Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:02 am

dmbsaxboyz wrote:
fatjack wrote:you would still say that the song was in C minor, the different notes are just treated as accidentals. a piece can have a phrygian feel (most predominantly made by the b2), but you still wouldn't say that the song is "in C phrygian." its as simple as saying that a song is in C minor centered around the phrygian mode
ahh i asked my traditional harmony proff, and he said that it just as you say, still C minor. he also said that the harmony dept. (jazz harmony to be exact) doesn't like to call it that. so that's prolly where I got used to it - berklee is weird o.o
yeah, well in jazz you can call anything whatever the fuck you want to

User avatar
mlb1399
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2559
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Des Moines, IA

Unread post by mlb1399 » Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:23 am

I gotta say this is one of the best threads I have seen on this site! MWR and fatjack, great info! :thumbsup:

Have either of you thought about doing a weekly music theory lesson on this site? It would be uber cool!

MWR
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Anytown, USA

Unread post by MWR » Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:57 pm

I'm glad to help. It might be better to have a question and answer sort of thing. I wonder if they have somthing like this up their sleeve for v3.0.


I wanted to clarify something real quick that might be confusing people regarding scales of origin. A scale of origin is simply a scale from which modes are built.
Major, minor, harmonic minor, and melodic minor were mentioned before. First off, because the melodic minor scale descends as the natural minor you can't use it effectively as a scale of origin because the harmony's always changing. Jazz minor is the same as the ascending melodic minor but it ascends and descends with the same notes. It's a far more common scale than the true melodic minor.
Of the above mentioned scales which are scales of origin? Well major obviously, harmonic minor, and Jazz minor. They can all have modes built from them. These aren't the ONLY ones but they are by far the most common. What about Natural Minor? Well, if you remember natural minor is the sixth mode of the major scale. You can't build modes from modes, daaaaar! Why is it consistantly mentioned along with those three other scales of origin? That's because it's considered the true or grandaddy of all minor tonality scales much like the Major scale is to major tonality scales. This brings us back to what Fatjack was saying.
This is important concept to understand. You have to be well aware of how these modes compare to 1)the scale of origin and 2) the Major scale if it has a major tonality and Natural minor if it has a minor tonality. The better you understand this the more effective you'll be at conveying the often subtle differences that distinguish each mode.

User avatar
fatjack
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 10165
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:09 am
Location: U of A
Contact:

Unread post by fatjack » Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:30 pm

MWR wrote:Major, minor, harmonic minor, and melodic minor were mentioned before. First off, because the melodic minor scale descends as the natural minor you can't use it effectively as a scale of origin because the harmony's always changing. Jazz minor is the same as the ascending melodic minor but it ascends and descends with the same notes. It's a far more common scale than the true melodic minor.
Of the above mentioned scales which are scales of origin? Well major obviously, harmonic minor, and Jazz minor. They can all have modes built from them. These aren't the ONLY ones but they are by far the most common. What about Natural Minor? Well, if you remember natural minor is the sixth mode of the major scale. You can't build modes from modes, daaaaar! Why is it consistantly mentioned along with those three other scales of origin? That's because it's considered the true or grandaddy of all minor tonality scales much like the Major scale is to major tonality scales.
i feel i need to correct some things in here, my theory professor gave an entire lesson on this subject last semester

the only "scale of origin" is the major scale. of course the modes originate from the major scale, but so did the concept of a minor scale.

when modes were first being applied, certain ones were used more often because they were less "problematic." for instance, the locrian mode is extremely problematic (in the sense of tonal motion) because of its odd scales degrees (every thing is flatted), but the mixolydian and the lydian were more practical because they only had one scale degree difference from the major scale.

regarding the origins of minor: the aeolian mode is considered the natural minor over the other three minor modes because its scale degrees create more consonance than the others. the scale degrees of aeolian are 1, 2, b3, 4, 5, b6, b7.

but aeolian was still problematic. the first problem encountered was the absence of the leading tone. without scale degree seven, you are lacking one of the most key defining tones in the scale. since the b7 leads down to scale degree six, the scale didn't have the final push to scale degree 1. also, with a b7, the V chord becomes minor, and thusly loses its function (a VERY important function). so what did the early theorists do? they simply raised the seventh degree of the aeolian mode to make a leading tone. so now the scale degrees are 1,2,b3,4,5,b6,7. look familiar? thats the harmonic minor scale! the harmonic minor scale was derived by fixing one of the "problems" of the aeolian mode

but doing so created another "problem." since harmonic minor contains b6 and 7, the scale now contains an augmented melodic second. this is a problem because it fucks up the diatonic stepwise motion that all scales are based off of. this is also what gives the harmonic minor its eastern type sound. so what did the early theorists do to fix this? they raised the sixth degree of the harmonic minor scale. so now they had 1,2,b3,4,5,6,7. hey look at that, its the melodic minor! and look at that, it still maintains the diatonic order (5 whole steps and 2 half steps). so the melodic minor is also a derivation of another scale. this is why i keep stressing that the melodic and harmonic minor are scale forms, NOT separate scales.

and you may also wonder why the melodic minor descends with the b6 and b7 (as if it was aeolian). thats because these scale degrees dont create the same problems whilst descending.

that was just a little history lesson, if you have any questions ask away. and maybe if you are nice i will tell you the origin of the "b"

MWR
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Anytown, USA

Unread post by MWR » Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:12 pm

What exactly were you correcting? :P

I actually am familiar with all of that except I wasn't quite sure why melodic minor decended as Natural minor.

Indeed history lessons are fun and interesting but it's not going to get people any closer to understanding the process of applying these "scale forms". Yes Harmonic Minor and Melodic Minor were altered from the Natural minor but these alterations are enough to create something that stands on it's own.
I mentioned in my first post that the Major scale is the essentially the only scale of origin. That's evident every time we spell out a scale like so: 1, 2, b3, 4, 5, b6, b7 . I should have been more clear that these "spellings" are always in relation to the major scale.
It certainly does simplify things. The Meldoic/Jazz minor is a perfect example. With the only difference being a b3 the scale becomes far less intimidating and much more familiar. That being said I think understanding modes is a multi step process and part of that process is to see how each mode stands on it's own, what kind of chords and melodies it creates etc.

One underlying problem is that no matter how well you understand the theory behind it all it doesn't mean you'll be able to apply it effectively. There are so many different melodies that can be created from just the Major scale. If you're not able to effectively communicate with one scale it's not going to get any easier with another.

User avatar
fatjack
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 10165
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:09 am
Location: U of A
Contact:

Unread post by fatjack » Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:21 pm

MWR wrote:One underlying problem is that no matter how well you understand the theory behind it all it doesn't mean you'll be able to apply it effectively. There are so many different melodies that can be created from just the Major scale. If you're not able to effectively communicate with one scale it's not going to get any easier with another.
good point, when i solo i usually look for the major scale that a certain section of chords apply to and then go from there. i dont think in modes to often

i think people need to realize that modes actually aren't as useful as they appear. VERY RARELY will you be able to use a single mode for an extended period of time within a song. they are usually applied to handle small changes in a chord (or passing chords) on which the root that is emphasized is the same. for instance moving from an Eb major scale to an Eb mixolydian within a progression, which serves the purpose of keeping the point of resolution as Eb, instead of changing it to Ab.

i think the first hurdle for an improviser to conquer is a thorough understanding of major scales and how they relate to one another, then modes can be addressed (and they will become easier to understand within advanced knowledge of major scales)

MWR
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Anytown, USA

Unread post by MWR » Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:53 pm

fatjack wrote: i think people need to realize that modes actually aren't as useful as they appear. VERY RARELY will you be able to use a single mode for an extended period of time within a song. they are usually applied to handle small changes in a chord (or passing chords) on which the root that is emphasized is the same. for instance moving from an Eb major scale to an Eb mixolydian within a progression, which serves the purpose of keeping the point of resolution as Eb, instead of changing it to Ab.
Exactly. That's seems to be the hardest part to explain. If you tell someone that G mixolydian is the same notes as C major but with G as the tonic they think they can just fly around the fretboard hitting those notes over anything in G and it's all good. When you try to explain that modes are applied in small fragments over certain chords they get discouraged. Mixolydian's a bad example but you know what I mean.

There are some many little things that are useful but people want to learn scales. Like arpeggios. Arpeggios are amazingly helpful in creating interesting melody. If for nothing else than forcing you to play wider intervals. A basic major or minor arpeggio "maps out" the 1st, 3rd, and 5th and you can add scale tones to that or approch those "in" notes with lower or upper neighbors. The possibilites are endless and it's a lot easier to apply than people think.
Last edited by MWR on Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fatjack
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 10165
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:09 am
Location: U of A
Contact:

Unread post by fatjack » Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:56 pm

MWR wrote: There are some many little things that are useful but people want to learn scales. Like arpeggios. Arpeggios are amazingly helpful in creating interesting melody. If for nothing else than forcing you to play wider intervals. A basic major or minor arpeggio "maps out" the 1st, 3rd, and 5th and you can add scale tones to that or approch those "in" notes with lower or upper neighbors. The possibilites are endless and it's a lot easier to apply than people think.
i was thinking about this when i posted, but i knew you would pick up on it so i didn't bother :wink:

yes, folks this is what we refer to as "spelling out the shanges" more useful than any other improv technique

MWR
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Anytown, USA

Unread post by MWR » Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:06 pm

When I first started to learn about soloing, being the naive turd that I was, I assumed spelling out the changes was just a boring way to approach improvisation. God was I dumb. It's THE way to improvise. :lol:

User avatar
DMBFan63
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 4800
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 6:57 am
Location: Bellmawr, NJ
Contact:

Unread post by DMBFan63 » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:37 am

this entire page is josh and mwr almost.. anyway, I love theory. it's unbelievably addicting to me. Whenever I learn something new in theory, any free time in school I have, I'm practicing it
Shows Been to: 7-17-02, 12-15-03, 7-20-04, 7-5/6-05

Dancing Ants
DMBTabs.com Council
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 4:09 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Unread post by Dancing Ants » Sun Jun 26, 2005 11:58 pm

http://www.highcountryguitar.com/modes1.htm

ok i've taken my Theory I class. Now


can someone explain to me how to know WHAT modes to play over certain chord progressions?
Direct Your Phish Questions Here Please

User avatar
Nuladion
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 1577
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Des Moines IA

Unread post by Nuladion » Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:07 pm

I'm just getting into this stuff, but I was wondering how you go about building and naming chords? How do you know what the root is? And what makes a chord major or minor?

User avatar
a1075dd63aa12
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 16974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 6:25 pm
Location: Beelzebub

Unread post by a1075dd63aa12 » Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:40 pm

Nuladion wrote:I'm just getting into this stuff, but I was wondering how you go about building and naming chords? How do you know what the root is? And what makes a chord major or minor?
Do you understand which notes are in major and minor scales? Im definitely not an expert but i know very basic theory

Example

Code: Select all

[b][u]Major Scale:[/b]  W: Whole Step  H:Half Step[/u]
  W  W  H W  W  W H
C  D   E  F  G   A  B  C
[u][b]Minor Scale[/b][/u]
  W  H  W  W  H   W  W
A  B   C  D  E    F   G  A

**Those two are perfect no sharps or flats but that pattern exists for the others**


User avatar
Nuladion
DMBTabs.com Authority
Posts: 1577
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Des Moines IA

Unread post by Nuladion » Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:46 pm

wkpggrvn2001 wrote:
Nuladion wrote:I'm just getting into this stuff, but I was wondering how you go about building and naming chords? How do you know what the root is? And what makes a chord major or minor?
Do you understand which notes are in major and minor scales? Im definitely not an expert but i know very basic theory

Example

Code: Select all

[b][u]Major Scale:[/b]  W: Whole Step  H:Half Step[/u]
  W  W  H W  W  W H
C  D   E  F  G   A  B  C
[u][b]Minor Scale[/b][/u]
  W  H  W  W  H   W  W
A  B   C  D  E    F   G  A

**Those two are perfect no sharps or flats but that pattern exists for the others**

I don't understand which ones are major or minor. But I do understand the half step vs. whole step because theres no such thing as a E# and B# right?

Post Reply

Return to “General Guitar Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests