Lesson in humility

gcom007 · Unread post by **gcom007** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 2:59 pm

6StringSamurai wrote:yea, i messed it up its basically a call for you to shut your pie hole...

go home, we can argue this if we want, I think he's completely wrong in many respects and openly arrogant at that, therefore I will have my two cents, now you had yours but don't try to act like you're above this situation...if only jkanter hadn't deleted that thread where he and I forget who just made complete asses out of themselves...

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:06 pm

Who isn't arrogant in your book? Jkanter on the list, now SUperman too?
I dont see why you have to try to put people down by saying that what they play was wrong even though there were tons of people that said otherwise.

gcom007 · Unread post by **gcom007** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:08 pm

6StringSamurai wrote:Who isn't arrogant in your book? Jkanter on the list, now SUperman too?
I dont see why you have to try to put people down by saying that what they play was wrong even though there were tons of people that said otherwise.

actually, as far as the stone goes, everyone said it was wrong and he still disputed saying it was right and dmb tab books are as accurate as it gets, but you must've missed that...

oh yeah, and kanter...that was based on the fact that he deletes threads if someone else trash talks anyone, you seem to be commenting on situations you don't wholly understand...

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:14 pm

what abou #41, Say goodbye, two step, and the one most everyone appreciated and enjoyed Rhyme and Reason, but you must have missed those..
About the kanter thing, trash talk had been going on since page 3 (the first person to say good luck, youll need it.
Anyway, I was trying to keep you guys from getting into it, and now i find that im "in it".
I'll try to avoid saying things that will make ya mad from now on bro.

crimsonPhantom · Unread post by **crimsonPhantom** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:14 pm

gcom007 wrote:
6StringSamurai wrote:Who isn't arrogant in your book? Jkanter on the list, now SUperman too?
I dont see why you have to try to put people down by saying that what they play was wrong even though there were tons of people that said otherwise.
actually, as far as the stone goes, everyone said it was wrong and he still disputed saying it was right and dmb tab books are as accurate as it gets, but you must've missed that...

oh yeah, and kanter...that was based on the fact that he deletes threads if someone else trash talks anyone, you seem to be commenting on situations you don't wholly understand...

CALM DOWN GUYS!!! :evil:

come on....plz listen....for some people, it works for guitar lessons and for others it doesnt. I can tell which one is best for me(both are good actually for myself), but not for everyone....i mean its not a universal thing...

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:15 pm

that was my intention! to get them to calm down..

gcom007 · Unread post by **gcom007** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:19 pm

6StringSamurai wrote:what abou #41, Say goodbye, two step, and the one most everyone appreciated and enjoyed Rhyme and Reason, but you must have missed those..
About the kanter thing, trash talk had been going on since page 3 (the first person to say good luck, youll need it.
Anyway, I was trying to keep you guys from getting into it, and now i find that im "in it".
I'll try to avoid saying things that will make ya mad from now on bro.

I'm not mad and no one is "in it" as you say, kanter and I just have a few little outstanding and civil disagreements, and note, did I say his songs were bad? no, but he swears that that's how dave plays them and the books are accurate and he is wrong...he then professes that lessons give you the theory you need to play by ear, and well, I have an ear and I can tell you what he's playing is wrong. That's all there is to it...he swears by things that work for him while ignoring a lot of other factors involved in things and he's provided proof for it in thinking his tab books are correct when they are so obviously wrong. so yeah, I could just go along and say, yeah, great, listen to everything he says and everyone feel happy, but there are always two sides of an argument and instead of letting another very practical side get ignored, I as well as others presented it.

superman0710 · Unread post by **superman0710** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 5:52 pm

i know 4 different ways to play #41, they all use the same chords in different spots...they all use the same notes, just in different registers.......... so you're telling me 3 out of those 4 ways are wrong just because "dave doesn't play them that way" ? :roll:

i hate to tell you buddy, but tab books pay PROFESSIONAL transcriptionists to sit down and transcribe EVERY NOTTE in a song, and while perhaps sometimes the register of the note they put down may be wrong, the key itself is dead on.... so don't even try to badmouth the tab books

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:03 pm

well put

gcom007 · Unread post by **gcom007** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:16 pm

superman0710 wrote:i know 4 different ways to play #41, they all use the same chords in different spots...they all use the same notes, just in different registers.......... so you're telling me 3 out of those 4 ways are wrong just because "dave doesn't play them that way" ?

i hate to tell you buddy, but tab books pay PROFESSIONAL transcriptionists to sit down and transcribe EVERY NOTTE in a song, and while perhaps sometimes the register of the note they put down may be wrong, the key itself is dead on.... so don't even try to badmouth the tab books

I'm not denying that, I could play 41 multiple ways too and have it sound almost exactly the same, but I'm not even referring to that...the tab books are just blatantly wrong...I'm tempted to go out and buy them just so i can show you examples of exactly how wrong they are...just look at your stone tab you swear by, that's not what dave plays! it's simple to pick out and that's not it...

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:18 pm

I think thats what hes saying tho, they arent what dave plays, but they produce the same sound so who cares?

gcom007 · Unread post by **gcom007** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:35 pm

6StringSamurai wrote:I think thats what hes saying tho, they arent what dave plays, but they produce the same sound so who cares?

let me make myself more clear, he is playing the wrong notes in pattern of single notes

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 6:48 pm

superman0710 · Unread post by **superman0710** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 9:18 pm

gcom007 wrote:
6StringSamurai wrote:I think thats what hes saying tho, they arent what dave plays, but they produce the same sound so who cares?
let me make myself more clear, he is playing the wrong notes in pattern of single notes

i'm just gonna stop arguing now because this is getting fucking silly..

next i'll be playing it 1/100th out of the hertz range it should be in.... :roll:

MattyTrane · Unread post by **MattyTrane** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 9:41 pm

<--doesnt konw what that means but oook

DMBTabs.com

Lesson in humility

Who is online