Lost Acoustics What You Are

[sbhanot]

Hey, I'm having some problems with this one - Its standard tuning on this version right? - anyway, I'm having problems with the "What you are.... is the beast in the lovers arm... etc." part of it....I get most of the rest of it - if someone who knows how to play this standard has a recording of it or any advice on how to play it solo in standard tuning, I'd love the help. Thanks!

[M Morrel]

Is it different from this tab? > http://www.dmbtabs.com/song.php?sid=58&tid=83

This always sounded right to me:

Chorus
Don't play last chord when returning to Verse or Fill
E:---------------------------------
B:---------------------------------
G:---------------------------------
D:-7-----7-----7-----10---9--7--6--
A -x-----x-----5-----x----x--x--x--
E:-5-----3-----x-----8----7--5--4--

[sbhanot]

I don't really have problems with the chorus part or the verse really, but its the bridge, which seems to have hammers or slides or something, I just can't get it.... its that "What you are.... DUM... DUM DUM DUM DUM DUUUMMMM.... is the Beast in the lovers arms....etc." Does anyone know what I'm talking about?

[sbhanot]

The part I was talking about was this part......

Break Down/End
E:------------------
B:------------------
G:-3--------1-------
D:-4--------2----1--
A:-4--------2----2--
E:-2--------0----2--


I think it sounds better like

New Break Down/End
E:------------------
B:------------------
G:----------1----4--
D:-4--------2----4--
A:-4--------2----2--
E:-2--------0-------

What do you think?

[DrFartbrain]

The original is correct, according to my official "Everyday" tab book. Plus, the original has the chord pattern descending, while yours is ascending. Kanter's is good...but your's would make a nice counterpart.

[sbhanot]

Yeah, kanters sounds good with the everyday disc, but I guess for solo play, the one I posted seems a bit less out of place, for me at least. Anyway, thanks for the help!